's over with a clear victory for "Striscia la Notizia" on all fronts, with a decision of the Court of Rome being terminated following the complaint of Insinna Flavio and Fabrizio Del Noce after services on some of the satirical Tg " oddities "and" randomness "in the game-show Raiuno" Deal or No Deal. "
Judge Ordinary Court of Rome, Dr. Marco Mancinetti, has noted today that the request to dismiss made by the prosecutor before has to be accepted.
Specifically, the measure of storage, it is stated that "the conduct of the competitor in the transmission Pelafiocche 'Your Business' aired December 4, 2006, it is illuminating for the definition of this story. The images are clear: we see that the contestant, repeatedly, looks and reads something into the palm of his hands, sometimes the right, mostly the left. Indeed, through the still image and then echoed by 'Striscia la notizia', it is clear that the Pelafiocche actually a black writing on the palm of his right hand. While applauding Pelafiocche is with the palm of his left hand open in favor of the camera, seems to show some writing, at least three inside of his left hand. It appears that all consequential the average viewer would take a strong suspicion, if not the conviction that what the competitor was read during transmission inside of his hands was somehow tied to the performance of the game. It 'obvious that if the writing had focused on another subject, there was no reason why the concurrent read, repeatedly, just in the course of the game and register the program. "
" Not using some clarity - reads the measure - is the outcome of the joint press conference held by the plaintiff, Del Noce, who ruled that the incident could be interpreted as symptomatic of the non-regularity of the game, as the competitor with a very personal initiative, he could have noted his lucky numbers on the palm of your hand. Apart from the assessment the merits of that justification (which to tell the truth is belied by the same Pelafiocche, which appeared in successive interviews on the media said that the hand had written down the numbers of other competitors, who feared they could erase) and following the only goal as to what happened in the transmission, the plaintiffs do not consider a key aspect of the story, namely that in a television broadcast in which they are distributed in prize money and which openly aspires to take before the public trappings of seriousness and transparency, the study to predict the presence of a notary, it is necessary that the randomness of the game is guaranteed not only in terms of substance, but also in terms of appearance. Would otherwise not be the reason to keep a notary in the studio, however, constantly called into question by the presenter.
"E 'burden of responsibility so the program - said the first point of the measure - measures taken to prevent transmission from the public and competitors , capable of undermining the image of reliability and regularity of the game. Otherwise, it is inevitable that they can be raised doubts and suspicions in the situation described there is no question that the criticism has been based on assumptions of fact and irrefutable. As for the language used in the episode complained of 'Striscia la notizia', the same is respectful of the limits of formal continence and the particular characteristics of satire. "
On the unusual frequency that sees super-packs of 500 000 and € 250 000 € of "Deal or No Deal" in play until the end, it gives reason to statistical tests organized by Codacons and Adusbef "the experiment performed the presence of a notary, a different statistical result that emerges in television broadcasts using the same format of 'Deal or No Deal' (eg Spain) are all objective data whose public disclosure is not practical to throw discredit free but to give an explanation, content and basis for its argument criticism of the transmission. "
Judge Ordinary Court of Rome, Dr. Marco Mancinetti, has noted today that the request to dismiss made by the prosecutor before has to be accepted.
Specifically, the measure of storage, it is stated that "the conduct of the competitor in the transmission Pelafiocche 'Your Business' aired December 4, 2006, it is illuminating for the definition of this story. The images are clear: we see that the contestant, repeatedly, looks and reads something into the palm of his hands, sometimes the right, mostly the left. Indeed, through the still image and then echoed by 'Striscia la notizia', it is clear that the Pelafiocche actually a black writing on the palm of his right hand. While applauding Pelafiocche is with the palm of his left hand open in favor of the camera, seems to show some writing, at least three inside of his left hand. It appears that all consequential the average viewer would take a strong suspicion, if not the conviction that what the competitor was read during transmission inside of his hands was somehow tied to the performance of the game. It 'obvious that if the writing had focused on another subject, there was no reason why the concurrent read, repeatedly, just in the course of the game and register the program. "
" Not using some clarity - reads the measure - is the outcome of the joint press conference held by the plaintiff, Del Noce, who ruled that the incident could be interpreted as symptomatic of the non-regularity of the game, as the competitor with a very personal initiative, he could have noted his lucky numbers on the palm of your hand. Apart from the assessment the merits of that justification (which to tell the truth is belied by the same Pelafiocche, which appeared in successive interviews on the media said that the hand had written down the numbers of other competitors, who feared they could erase) and following the only goal as to what happened in the transmission, the plaintiffs do not consider a key aspect of the story, namely that in a television broadcast in which they are distributed in prize money and which openly aspires to take before the public trappings of seriousness and transparency, the study to predict the presence of a notary, it is necessary that the randomness of the game is guaranteed not only in terms of substance, but also in terms of appearance. Would otherwise not be the reason to keep a notary in the studio, however, constantly called into question by the presenter.
"E 'burden of responsibility so the program - said the first point of the measure - measures taken to prevent transmission from the public and competitors , capable of undermining the image of reliability and regularity of the game. Otherwise, it is inevitable that they can be raised doubts and suspicions in the situation described there is no question that the criticism has been based on assumptions of fact and irrefutable. As for the language used in the episode complained of 'Striscia la notizia', the same is respectful of the limits of formal continence and the particular characteristics of satire. "
On the unusual frequency that sees super-packs of 500 000 and € 250 000 € of "Deal or No Deal" in play until the end, it gives reason to statistical tests organized by Codacons and Adusbef "the experiment performed the presence of a notary, a different statistical result that emerges in television broadcasts using the same format of 'Deal or No Deal' (eg Spain) are all objective data whose public disclosure is not practical to throw discredit free but to give an explanation, content and basis for its argument criticism of the transmission. "
by "digital satellite"
0 comments:
Post a Comment